Klara Veldman vs Sarah Van Emst Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In competition over the past year, both Veldman and Emst have displayed fairly similar performances, with Veldman securing victories in 55% of his matches (W/L record of 22/18) and Emst slightly edging him out with a 56.41% win rate (W/L record of 22/17). A close examination of their level of competition reveals Veldman tackling higher-ranked adversaries, as his opponents averaged a rank of 279.27 compared to Emst's 389.18. Thus, Veldman has faced somewhat tougher competition.

Focusing on second serve performance over the recent six months, Veldman won 39.24% of points, whereas Emst fared notably better with a 47.48% win rate. This statistic is significant in accurately predicting match outcomes. Likewise, return game stats demonstrate slight differences; while Veldman has won 51.35% of his opponent's second serve points, Emst narrowly leads with 52.14%. On first serve returns, Veldman managed to secure 35.37% of points compared to Emst's 34.25%, suggesting a minor edge for Veldman in this area of gameplay.

Examining surface performance, both players excel on hard courts. Veldman's win rate on hard surfaces stands at 55% (W/L 37/30), whereas Emst boasts a more impressive 69% win rate on the same surface (W/L 24/11). However, on clay, Veldman struggles with a 36% win rate (W/L 20/36), while Emst performs better with a 50% win rate (W/L 22/22).

Regarding pressure situations, Emst shows a stronger mental fortitude with a 60% rate of saving break points, while Veldman has saved 45.45% of breakpoints faced. Additionally, converting break point opportunities shows Veldman slightly ahead, with a conversion rate of 50% compared to Emst's 44.12%.

In terms of player levels, both have competed primarily in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K. Veldman has won 58.82% of these matches (W/L 20/14), slightly outperforming Emst who has won 56.67% (W/L 17/13). For those considering live betting, Veldman demonstrates better poise in crucial deciding sets, winning 64% compared to Emst's 45%.

Taking all these statistics into account, while both players have strengths in different areas, Emst's superior performance on hard surfaces and consistent breakpoint-saving ability tip the balance in his favor. Therefore, based on current stat comparisons, Emst holds the predictive edge to win the upcoming match.